which of the following are consistent with the efficient markets hypothesis? check all that apply.

1. Consumers are rational and resourceful. They don’t take advantage of opportunities, especially when it comes to opportunities that require some self-awareness.

2. The efficient market hypothesis is a theory that assumes that consumers do not make unreasonable choices. While this is a valid theory, the fact that people make unreasonable choices does not prove that they are irrational.

It’s not really reasonable to have a choice between something that has no benefit and something that has a benefit which can be traded for something else. We could also say that people generally trade something for something else and do not always make the best decision.

The efficient market hypothesis is a theory that assumes that consumers do not make unreasonable choices. While this is a valid theory, the fact that people make unreasonable choices does not prove that they are irrational. Its not really unreasonable to have a choice between something that has no benefit and something that has a benefit which can be traded for something else. Its just that the cost of what you are paid for is higher for that decision than the cost of the goods you are paid for.

The only thing that really drives the demand for the game is the fact that it’s really a slow-mo game. Just being a slow-mo game is like being a slow-mo game that only makes sense if it takes a bit of time.

So the efficient markets hypothesis is that the market for a good or service is efficient.

A lot of things that market economies (or more specifically, efficient markets) claim to be efficient are actually just a lot of things that are just easier to do. We’ve seen a lot of companies that claimed to be “efficient” but were actually just a lot of things that we can do a lot more efficiently. Take food for example.

But what makes a service or good or product more efficient than another? Thats the question the efficient markets hypothesis has no answer to. It just wants to look for the best possible answer, but its main purpose is to make people think faster.

The reason that we’ve learned about the efficient markets hypothesis is that it provides a way to make sure people don’t waste too much time trying to figure out how to do things faster and better. In our case, the only thing that would be a lot faster that we’d need to get started is the time the brain can think about how to do things faster and better.